'Failure is always an option' Bagseed Hydro grow

Here's what the display on mine looks in uS/cm mode. No loss of precision as it goes to 4 digits. If you're only seeing 1 digit past the decimal in EC mode that's not super precise as you've said. Get a meter that does 4 digit EC with graphite probes and forget all about PPM.

View attachment 18985
I use blue lab monitors and now that you mention it i don't know if ive read mine on EC mode. I'll check it out tomorrow.
EC= not many


20230804_093333.jpg
 
Another update since I'm stuck at home tonight as I blew a swaybar link pulling into my driveway last night. Simple job but Volvo doesn't feel it's important to be open on weekends since covid.

Huge difference in Co2 already! The plants have woken up? Sensor is right at canopy level. Check the Co2 levels for this past week.

Previously.png


Here's a 6hr view. Co2 crashes right after the water change. Much better respiration.

CO2 drop.png
 
Is your EC sensor also from Atlas Scientific? You should be able to see if EC is drifting up or down. From my understanding you want it to drift down slightly (or stay the same, never increase). That way you know the plants are consuming slightly more nutrients than water. On the other hand, if EC is increasing they are sucking the water out of the solution leaving nutrients behind. The increase in concentration will spiral out of control into ever higher EC and lockout / slowed growth.

Not sure to what extent that works in practice. The sensor needs to be spot on. I've been playing around with a cheap sensor but in my case there are other factors that impact the measurements. Despite using a temperature sensor I can see the temps have an impact on my results. Also it seems that some gunk is building up on the sensor resulting in low measurements...
 
Is your EC sensor also from Atlas Scientific? You should be able to see if EC is drifting up or down. From my understanding you want it to drift down slightly (or stay the same, never increase). That way you know the plants are consuming slightly more nutrients than water. On the other hand, if EC is increasing they are sucking the water out of the solution leaving nutrients behind. The increase in concentration will spiral out of control into ever higher EC and lockout / slowed growth.

Not sure to what extent that works in practice. The sensor needs to be spot on. I've been playing around with a cheap sensor but in my case there are other factors that impact the measurements. Despite using a temperature sensor I can see the temps have an impact on my results. Also it seems that some gunk is building up on the sensor resulting in low measurements...
Couple charts that pertain to what your saying .

Screenshot_20221231-073315_Gallery.jpgScreenshot_20230504-174041_Chrome.jpg
 
FML, found mites on the mother plant in the lung room today. Sprayed it down with soapy water + neem oil.

Mites.jpg


Dunno if the lower EC is working or not. Got it down to 1.1 now but B3 is showing these weird clusters of pistils on a couple of buds. Maybe just new growth since it's not locked out? Also most of the leaves are getting rust spots.

cluster of pistils.jpg

Screenshot_2023-09-02_14-07-07.png
 
Great documentation.

What I see is a plant that was overfed. You can see it on the tips, in the veins, and with the coloring. IMO plants are more susceptible to problems with too much feeding, or more appropriately imbalances for the stage of the plant.

If it has really been 26 days since a water change, I'd say you are overdue. Can you see the roots?

I'll scroll back thru the thread and see if I can answer the rest of my questions.
 
@smoke Guessing from the manual, for some reason they limit the precision displayed in EC/CM mode. In that case using PPM 700 makes perfect sense.


View attachment 18993
Yes I'm on the same track, except I use 500 scale because it is more of a standard and the math is easier on my stoney lump I call a brain.

It is undoubtedly a calculation only, you are not really upping the sensitivity or anything. 700 is the same sensitivity as 500, just math applied to give you a bigger number. Pick one and stick with it so you get used to the numbers and what adding x ml of whatever does in your system.
 
What I see is a plant that was overfed. You can see it on the tips, in the veins, and with the coloring. IMO plants are more susceptible to problems with too much feeding, or more appropriately imbalances for the stage of the plant.

If it has really been 26 days since a water change, I'd say you are overdue. Can you see the roots?

Yea it seems EC was way high for a while. I did a 50-60% change yesterday.

pH was around 6 after the change and has dropped .12 in about 24 hr. EC has also risen very slightly, .01-.02 since then.
 
FML, found mites on the mother plant in the lung room today. Sprayed it down with soapy water + neem oil.
Shiiit man that sucks.
Ive been reading a lot lately on bugs and getting rid of them.
Id get after them with a dusting if micronized sulfur, then 4 days later spray them down with water to remove any dead ones and hit them again the night of the 4th day or on the 5th day.
Id do that for like 2 or 3 weeks.
 
Yea it seems EC was way high for a while. I did a 50-60% change yesterday.

pH was around 6 after the change and has dropped .12 in about 24 hr. EC has also risen very slightly, .01-.02 since then.
At this point, ride it out. Scrolling back thru, I'm thinking you are learning a ton this grow and next one will be so much better.
 
At this point, ride it out. Scrolling back thru, I'm thinking you are learning a ton this grow and next one will be so much better.
Cool man appreciate the insight. Will roll one up and let it ride for now. Always trying to soak up as much as I can. Lots of great wisdom here.
 
Shiiit man that sucks.
Ive been reading a lot lately on bugs and getting rid of them.
Id get after them with a dusting if micronized sulfur, then 4 days later spray them down with water to remove any dead ones and hit them again the night of the 4th day or on the 5th day.
Id do that for like 2 or 3 weeks.
Mites have me worried but I've dealt with them before. Just not on flowering plants so I really don't want them spreading there.

I have some Permethrin that I'll hit the mothers with if I see any signs tomorrow.
 
pH was around 6 after the change and has dropped .12 in about 24 hr. EC has also risen very slightly, .01-.02 since then.
Hey WeedRider- I'd have to go back through and see your specifics but a rising EC together with a falling pH indicates you are still a bit hot on your nutrients.
 
Last edited:
Not to be bummer but once webs are prevalent you're going to have a hard time eradicating them unless you're able to quarantine not only the plants but the room it's in.

Insecticidal soap and Neem aren't going to do much at this stage especially if they are mendo mites which are the worst. If you don't want to use harsh chemicals you can use a vacuum cleaner and clean them off that way but you'll have to be vigilant and do it for weeks before you break the life death cycle.

I like to use a product called Azamax. It is a neem oil derivative that can be used on fruits and vegetables 10 days before harvest. It'll kill any living mite that comes into contact while also killing any hatchlings as long as you reapply every few days depending on the depth of your infestation. I usually need about 2 weeks to eradicate the infestation, again, depending on the depth of the infestation. It's also OMRI listed.

I like to do a soil drench along with my first application to get ahead of the hatchlings in the soil.
 
What is your background? You obviously are not afraid of EE.

What is your purpose for growing? Is your ultimate goal yield? Pheono hunting?

It's 4:20 here. hehe
Just growing for personal use right now. $200 oz I can save a lot of money with better quality (eventually). Network/IT guy and like playing around with MCU. Smoke weed ev'r dy!
 
Hey WeedRider- I'd have to go back through and see your specifics but a rising EC together with a falling pH indicates you are still a bit hot on your nutrients.
I recently learned that each component of fertiliser has a different impact on EC. Calcium has a disproportionately big impact. Plants could be consuming less calcium therefore the EC is increasing but everything else is on point. Not saying that is happening here, but it can. Hence water changes are required to some extent even if EC looks perfect. EC does not tell you which nutrients the plants are really using.

I think it was Prof Bugbee. He also said to think of fertiliser as minerals/vitamins for humans and light as the actual food. Plants mostly need the fertiliser to be able to use the light, which is the real source of energy.

Please correct me if I'm wrong...
 
I recently learned that each component of fertiliser has a different impact on EC. Calcium has a disproportionately big impact. Plants could be consuming less calcium therefore the EC is increasing but everything else is on point. Not saying that is happening here, but it can. Hence water changes are required to some extent even if EC looks perfect. EC does not tell you which nutrients the plants are really using.

I think it was Prof Bugbee. He also said to think of fertiliser as minerals/vitamins for humans and light as the actual food. Plants mostly need the fertiliser to be able to use the light, which is the real source of energy.

Please correct me if I'm wrong...
I like the way you put that.

My only caveat is that nutes are not needed for photosynthesis. But they are needed to build the cells around it.

I did a quick search for EC of different nutes and didnā€™t find anything. That would be handy info to have. Basically the conductivity of different elements. If I canā€™t find something I can do a bench test and measure it.
 
I like the way you put that.

My only caveat is that nutes are not needed for photosynthesis. But they are needed to build the cells around it.

I did a quick search for EC of different nutes and didnā€™t find anything. That would be handy info to have. Basically the conductivity of different elements. If I canā€™t find something I can do a bench test and measure it.
Thanks for the clarification on photosynthesis.

I asked GPT4 but did not double check the output:
At a minimum I would assume the concept is accurate.

I googled this also. Seems to be linked to Purdue and looks legit. That is as far as my research currently goes.

(Calcium is not that impactful, only compared to Mg I guess - oops)
 
there's an old thread at the old place that went through this in depth. some old name, iirc it was seamaiden and gnome, dove deep into the whole conductivity of various minerals and how they impacted EC in a solution. good luck finding that stuff though. much of the late 2000s and early 2010s clandestine research is buried in the cesspool of the interwebz now.
 
Update on the mite situation. Hadn't seen any activity since I applied neem oil and alcohol via spray on Sat. But this morning they were back and now on both mother plants. Applied some Permethrin as the neem+alcohol really did a number on the mothers. They're not dead but darn near.

Also applied Permethrin to the outside of the tent near the vents. Going to move the mothers outside the lung room then treat it with insecticide spray. Should have done that from the start.
 
Week 8 update with photos. As far as I can tell things have been improving since I lowered the EC. Buds are getting bigger and I'm seeing some new growth under the canopy. I fear seeing mites every time I open the tent but so far been lucky. I've moved the mothers out of the lunch room just in case. I also applied vegetable safe general purpose pesticide to the corners of the lung room and along the bottom of the tent (on the outside).

With this lower EC it's much harder to adjust pH, I keep overshooting. Sort of getting the hang of it. Might start using higher ratio tap to RO to increase the buffering.

Overall view
Plants.jpg


B1. Not doing great but not really in the way so I've left it.
B1.jpg


B3 buds. These are kinda starting to look like Northern Lights to my untrained eye. This plant has shown some new growth under the canopy with healthier looking green leaves.
B3.1.jpg
B3 buds
B3.2.jpg
B3 Buds
B3.3.jpg



B4 buds. Can tell they are a different plant than B3. These have been doing really well.
B4.1.jpg

B4 bud
B4.2.jpg
B4 bud
B4.3.jpg


Just added some water you can see how the pH goes crazy even though I pH the water to match before I add it.
Screenshot_2023-09-09_16-21-02.png
 
Week 9 update. Think one more week and they will be ready to chop. Trichomes are turning white and I think I see a few amber on B4. I bought a USB microscope but wasn't able to get any decent close-ups out of it.

B4 buds.
B4.2.jpg

B4.1.jpg


B3 buds, getting nice and white
B3.2.jpg

B3.1.jpg

B1 bud
B1.jpg

Screenshot_2023-09-15_16-11-23.png
 
Found more nanners yesterday. :( B3 plant instead of on B4 like before. Clipped that bud and was able to take some slightly better photos of the trips. Thinking I should chop this plant very soon, tomorrow or this weekend. The younger plant B4 seems like it could use another week most of the pistils are still white.


Dashboard for last week, ignore the light cycle irregularities. Been having some issues with sensor reliability.

Screenshot_2023-09-21_19-19-50.png

Photos are all of B3.
nanner.jpgIMG_20230921_184952.jpgIMG_20230921_184939.jpgB3 trips 2.jpgB3 trips.jpg
 
Decided to have a go at the water cure method with this first bud. No smell would be an advantage in certain situations. Plus can't beat the time saved.


So far no signs of mites or mold in the tent, fingers crossed. I have 6 clones going in the aerogarden plus a couple downstairs yet.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom