Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Pretty much, a small root system can support a large plant, I'm sure theres a maximum correlation amount of root zone-to-canopy size but yea, a bigger pot also does not mean 100% or so of that media is actually going to rootzone,So the takeaway I'm seeing here is with fertigation a large root system is not necessary due to the frequent feeds?
I dont see why not, the coco will act like a wick alongside the roots.I have been reading alot of good things about the autopots. I looked for 1 gallon autopots but the smallest ones I found were 3 gallon versions. I always thought that bottom feeding coco was a no go.
it just boils down to the root zone environment condition/variables.But with my current Grow I am learning to fertigate when needed and I have not had any issues so far. So I am not feeding until runoff every time. Once a day at most. So I bet if you top feed once a week until runoff in autopots you can have great success.
Plus, it takes less time for that root zone to develop a nice densely nurturing root ball in a smaller pot.So the takeaway I'm seeing here is with fertigation a large root system is not necessaryVreeland due to the frequent feeds?
The whole idea behind the autopots in my mind is no top feeding needed.I only half feed my pots after I transplant into the AP's the first time then they feed off the bottom. I use Promix & perlite I know nothing about Coco, Promix is too simple to want to changeI have been reading alot of good things about the autopots. I looked for 1 gallon autopots but the smallest ones I found were 3 gallon versions. I always thought that bottom feeding coco was a no go. But with my current Grow I am learning to fertigate when needed and I have not had any issues so far. So I am not feeding until runoff every time. Once a day at most. So I bet if you top feed once a week until runoff in autopots you can have great success.
I went to RDWC hydro because I do believe bigger roots = bigger fruits.I know Moe used them for a while but I don't know why he stopped, seems so simple maybe that's why, too easy for him.
Would you suggest running a 1 gal with a photo plant in coco? Because coco is an inert substrate the only ion source would come from what you are feeding correct?Remember there is a difference between root mass, root structure and container size.
You can have the same root mass in a 1 gal pot and a 3 gal pot. Just because the pot is bigger doesn’t mean it has a larger root mass. The roots are just more dense in a smaller container and thus requires more effort in keeping a stable root zone and supply of nutrients. Gas exchange is faster because of less media and growth is increased.
The term rootbound as it is used by us cannabis growers is 99% BS. They are not rootbound, we are simply not looking after the needs well enough to replenish the small amount of media.
Only if you can maintain the stability of ph, EC, and WC. Otherwise you will cause yourself issues.Would you suggest running a 1 gal with a photo plant in coco? Because coco is an inert substrate the only ion source would come from what you are feeding correct?
So we're keeping a smaller container to sequester the roots for better O² exchange by not doing a large feed then allowing dryback but rather small feeds to keep the WC% consistent trying to find the WC level where they can optimize their O² exchange?Only if you can maintain the stability of ph, EC, and WC. Otherwise you will cause yourself issues.
Its all a balance. If you have an autofeed system i say yes go for it. If you are hand watering then 2-5 gal may be a better option.
Growth increase from using the least media possible is 100% contingent on ability to maintain a stable root zone. If you can’t it will be a hindrance and cause issues or what people incorrectly refer to as rootbound.
Each fertigation brings in o2 and the higher ratio of media exposed means better gas exchange. WC is an important factor but you can still have drybacks. They just aren’t as necessary or impactful as in bigger pots. You still have drybacks they just happen much faster and do not need to be as drasticSo we're keeping a smaller container to sequester the roots for better O² exchange by not doing a large feed then allowing dryback but rather small feeds to keep the WC% consistent trying to find the WC level where they can optimize their O² exchange?
I have an auto irrigate system I made so I can control feed frequency and amounts at every event. I'll follow @Observer recommendations to start and spend a few days dialing in the WC%.
Hey Aqua man....Root bound to me is when I see stalling in the plants growth in small pots. When I start seeds in solo cups there is daily progress, then after about 2-3 weeks I can notice a change in growth where the top doesn't grow upwards and over a day or two I can notice the stall. It happens when I don't get them out of the small cups and the roots wraps the bottom and its all root around the inside of the cup. I've called that rootbound but you say that's the wrong term?? and if I do??? something other than transplant It will grow without the accompanied stunting? or have I read that wrong?Only if you can maintain the stability of ph, EC, and WC. Otherwise you will cause yourself issues.
Its all a balance. If you have an autofeed system i say yes go for it. If you are hand watering then 2-5 gal may be a better option.
Growth increase from using the least media possible is 100% contingent on ability to maintain a stable root zone. If you can’t it will be a hindrance and cause issues or what people incorrectly refer to as rootbound.
Remember there is a difference between root mass, root structure and container size.
You can have the same root mass in a 1 gal pot and a 3 gal pot. Just because the pot is bigger doesn’t mean it has a larger root mass. The roots are just more dense in a smaller container and thus requires more effort in keeping a stable root zone and supply of nutrients. Gas exchange is faster because of less media and growth is increased.
I wanted to say something along these lines too, but aqua said it better though.The term rootbound as it is used by us cannabis growers is 99% BS. They are not rootbound, we are simply not looking after the needs well enough to replenish the small amount of media.
Yea that's not rootbound, they are circling the bottom of the container and then they'll continue circling up, growing a denser root ball, ik ur not asking me thoHey Aqua man....Root bound to me is when I see stalling in the plants growth in small pots. When I start seeds in solo cups there is daily progress, then after about 2-3 weeks I can notice a change in growth where the top doesn't grow upwards and over a day or two I can notice the stall. It happens when I don't get them out of the small cups and the roots wraps the bottom and its all root around the inside of the cup. I've called that rootbound but you say that's the wrong term?? and if I do??? something other than transplant It will grow without the accompanied stunting? or have I read that wrong?
Well the plants stunt in the small pots for me, what is it if not root bound? I know were just talking semantics here but what is root bound then? The term came from somewhere, I'm just assuming a full pot of roots and unhealthy looking leaves that thrive when transplanted was root bound.but your saying a better feed schedule and more O2 access will eliminate the...root bound symptom even in small pots?Yea that's not rootbound, they are circling the bottom of the container and then they'll continue circling up, growing a denser root ball, ik ur not asking me tho
But are those solos with soil, and organic amendments?
""We are simply not looking after the needs well enough to replenish the small amount of media."""
From what I'm understanding it won't get root bound if you are feeding it at a rate that doesn't flood the root ball and put the roots essentially under water. As long as they are getting a fairly constant flow of water at a rate that maintains a WC in the soil that allows them to do their O² exchanges that seems to be the goldilocks zone you want to put them in.Well the plants stunt in the small pots for me, what is it if not root bound? I know were just talking semantics here but what is root bound then? The term came from somewhere, I'm just assuming a full pot of roots and unhealthy looking leaves that thrive when transplanted was root bound.but your saying a better feed schedule and more O2 access will eliminate the...root bound symptom even in small pots?
Correct. If you can maintain the rootzone they will be fine. Round bound would be when there is not enough space for the roots. The roots grow like that because thats where they are getting the most moisture and o2. Typically the bottom and outsides.Hey Aqua man....Root bound to me is when I see stalling in the plants growth in small pots. When I start seeds in solo cups there is daily progress, then after about 2-3 weeks I can notice a change in growth where the top doesn't grow upwards and over a day or two I can notice the stall. It happens when I don't get them out of the small cups and the roots wraps the bottom and its all root around the inside of the cup. I've called that rootbound but you say that's the wrong term?? and if I do??? something other than transplant It will grow without the accompanied stunting? or have I read that wrong?
I've not seen fabric pots get root wrapped, the roots grow through the soil not around the inside of the pot. I have a large garbage bag full of old fabric pots I don't know what to do with. I can't see me getting out of the Autopots and using them again.Correct. If you can maintain the rootzone they will be fine. Round bound would be when there is not enough space for the roots. The roots grow like that because thats where they are getting the most moisture and o2. Typically the bottom and outsides.
I had pictures showing this on the other site. The type of container also plays a role. Fabric are less likely to grow like that because of the gas exchange.
I'd say rootbound is when a plant has out-grown its container, there's no more space for roots, take a 1 gallon of soil for instance, eventually that soil will be devoid of nutrients and can no longer support the plants needs, compared to its size, stage and Evironmemt.Well the plants stunt in the small pots for me, what is it if not root bound? I know were just talking semantics here but what is root bound then? The term came from somewhere, I'm just assuming a full pot of roots and unhealthy looking leaves that thrive when transplanted was root bound.but your saying a better feed schedule and more O2 access will eliminate the...root bound symptom even in small pots?
So once your pot is full of roots, as long as you maintain a constant source of water at a particular level, the plant won't need to continue growing roots and will utilize what you are feeding it with the existing roots it has?Correct. If you can maintain the rootzone they will be fine. Round bound would be when there is not enough space for the roots. The roots grow like that because thats where they are getting the most moisture and o2. Typically the bottom and outsides.
I had pictures showing this on the other site. The type of container also plays a role. Fabric are less likely to grow like that because of the gas exchange.
No if the pot is full of roots it will be rootbound. But to that point when was the last time you seen a pot of a solid rootball?So once your pot is full of roots, as long as you maintain a constant source of water at a particular level, the plant won't need to continue growing roots and will utilize what you are feeding it with the existing roots it has?
Hydro ftw.
In all fairness there probably was only a shot glass worth of fog on those roots. 90% O2 didn’t hurt.Hydro ftw.
Nice buds but I wanna know your manicurer