Cannabis and o2 in the rootzone

Everything I am talking about is hydro. I wouldn't expect the amount of O2 in water for soil or coco to make that much of a difference. I could be wrong on that, still lots of things to test.
Sorry to chime in late, but I was told to oxygenate the water using an air pump and air stone....for several hours prior to feeding my plants in soil. Also the Terp tea people say to fo it when using their product which I do...Is this wisdom or bunk?
 
Last edited:
Sorry to chime in late, but I was told to oxygenate the water using an air pump and air stone....for several hours prior to feeding my plants in soil. Also the Terp tea people say to fo it when using their product which I do...Is this wisdom or bunk?
20230731_104459.jpg
 
Everything I am talking about is hydro. I wouldn't expect the amount of O2 in water for soil or coco to make that much of a difference. I could be wrong on that, still lots of things to test.
i see ur point

soil is slow, playing with DO is one of the top variables for growth rates, and yet soil is at the bottom, trying to mix the two seems....counter intuitive...
 
Yeah 👍 like maybe a little bin bubbler with Coco choir above and maybe perlite in the bottom area. Plus a shallow plastic dish in the bottom of the fabric types

Just run it almost dry and reload w/pH optimal solution, adjust for ppm


I bet it would be sweet and you could dial it to nitrogen fixation and yeast enzymes. It's bet outside plants would explode

You will need to dial back the volume imo… unless adding a bit of water to the bottom so your not pumping dry air into the rootzone but even then you want a small volume
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry to chime in late, but I was told to oxygenate the water using an air pump and air stone....for several hours prior to feeding my plants in soil. Also the Terp tea people say to fo it when using their product which I do...Is this wisdom or bunk?
I would not say it is bunk, stirring and good O2 will never hurt. But compared to hydro, I would not expect the amount of O2 in the water used to feed soil would make a big difference. Not nothing, but negligible. I have no testing to back this up, just a gut feeling.
 
I would not say it is bunk, stirring and good O2 will never hurt. But compared to hydro, I would not expect the amount of O2 in the water used to feed soil would make a big difference. Not nothing, but negligible. I have no testing to back this up, just a gut feeling.
Who got me started on Terp Tea from Organics was @Observer who used it in his soil grows. The directions on the package are pretty clear about giving it a good bubbling for 24 hours before dissemination. Watering systems like Bluenose or whatever it is called or even drip irrigation wouldn't get any extra 02 and maybe their plants don't care. Be curious, most of the positive things happen when you simply follow the given directions -- like replicating BudGoodman's cup in cup method. I like to try new things especially if they work. Success has many mothers and fathers while failure remains an orphan.
 
Who got me started on Terp Tea from Organics was @Observer who used it in his soil grows. The directions on the package are pretty clear about giving it a good bubbling for 24 hours before dissemination. Watering systems like Bluenose or whatever it is called or even drip irrigation wouldn't get any extra 02 and maybe their plants don't care. Be curious, most of the positive things happen when you simply follow the given directions -- like replicating BudGoodman's cup in cup method. I like to try new things especially if they work. Success has many mothers and fathers while failure remains an orphan.
Not an expert here. I think terp teas would benefit from both agitation and oxygenation. I think you are doing it right.

How much of that bubbling results in more O2 directly to the roots - that would be my question. My feeling is minimal.
 
Sorry to chime in late, but I was told to oxygenate the water using an air pump and air stone....for several hours prior to feeding my plants in soil. Also the Terp tea people say to fo it when using their product which I do...Is this wisdom or bunk?
Yeah not bunk… terp tea I believe uses bacteria to break it down and they use a lot of o2 so just like any tea it’s important to aerate the tea
 
However, it's essential to clarify that the increase in oxygen solubility is due to the dissolved CO2 in carbonated water, not the carbonation itself. Carbonation creates an environment that can hold more dissolved gases, and this can include an increased capacity for holding oxygen as well.
😆 oxygen saturation extremism. It's a solid strategy IMO


I would be looking closely at all the possible delivery route
Fuckin tank of o2

High efficiency aeration membranes
Nanobubble generator
Ceramic oxygen diffusers
Carbonated water (?)
Pressure(?) And lower temperature
D2O (?) Has more weight, does it have "more" pressure in the substance/solution between the molecules?
Oxygen nanodispersoids(???)
High-pressure system to dissolve oxygen.


Oxygen Nanobubbles with Nano-Enhanced Coating:
  • Employ oxygen nanobubbles coated with specialized nanomaterials that enhance gas dissolution efficiency.
  • Theoretical Maximum DO Saturation: Theoretical maximum DO saturation levels can exceed 100 mg/L due to the enhanced gas dissolution properties of nanobubbles
Electrochemical Oxygenation:

  • Implement electrochemical processes to generate oxygen in situ through the electrolysis of water.
  • Theoretical Maximum DO Saturation: Theoretical maximum DO saturation levels depend on the efficiency of the electrolysis process but can potentially achieve 50-70 mg/L
  • Biological Oxygen Production:
    • Cultivate specific microorganisms or algae that have exceptionally high rates of oxygen production through photosynthesis or bioconversion processes.
    • Theoretical Maximum DO Saturation: Theoretical maximum DO saturation levels can vary greatly depending on the selected microorganisms, but some engineered systems may achieve 50-100 mg/L or more.
 
the possibilities are endless


anyone else keeping up with this congress/UAP hearing ?

any of this UAP stuff?

this isnt the thread for it lol
 
Last edited:
electrolysis sounds promising?

but affect on the plant/medium root zone?

would be safer for yall then o2 tanks?



just An Observer looking in....
 
And obviously some of this is out of the realm of homegrowers abilities perhaps

But for theory maximums and convo

If theres a will theres a way.

Theorycraft
 
Fog
Bio - algae o2 producers
Nanobubbles
O2 tank
Electrolysis
Membranes, not airstones.
 
Gases are independent co2 doesn’t effect o2. The electrolysis is bunk bro don’t drink the koolaid on that. It produces microbubbles that trick the DO sensor into supersaturated levels but its not. Plus it can add heavy metals to your water and is NOT recommended for water containing minerals.

@Moe.Red had already achieved 300 mg/L.

Trust me when i say i have explored about every option available nothing will beat an o2 concentrator in safety and results… it just won’t happen bro
 
Gases are independent co2 doesn’t effect o2. The electrolysis is bunk bro don’t drink the koolaid on that. It produces microbubbles that trick the DO sensor into supersaturated levels but its not. Plus it can add heavy metals to your water and is NOT recommended for water containing minerals.

@Moe.Red had already achieved 300 mg/L.

I want, down the line
Lol

Trust me when i say i have explored about every option available nothing will beat an o2 concentrator in safety and results… it just won’t happen bro
Well shit
 
Well shit
I know… i was of the mindset there has to be an easier way for prob close to a year but i cannot figure anything better than an o2 concentrator… especially for safety. I spent years on this. But it is possible i missed something i just haven’t seen anything or come across anything to lead me to believe something else would be better
 
I know… i was of the mindset there has to be an easier way for prob close to a year but i cannot figure anything better than an o2 concentrator… especially for safety. I spent years on this. But it is possible i missed something i just haven’t seen anything or come across anything to lead me to believe something else would be better
well shit i need to know his method then, and then if that can be improved on
obviously you guys are smarter than me and know way more of this stuff let alone the basics.

id like to think maybe i could find something that you guys missed or overlooked if possible, perhaps
but im only a half genius lol

maybe something yet to be developed, but again yall would know, i wouldnt.

was it just the fog? and the o2 concentrator ? is there a 3rd thing...


appreciate ya


just An Observer looking in...
 
well shit i need to know his method then, and then if that can be improved on
obviously you guys are smarter than me and know way more of this stuff let alone the basics.

id like to think maybe i could find something that you guys missed or overlooked if possible, perhaps
but im only a half genius lol

maybe something yet to be developed, but again yall would know, i wouldnt.

was it just the fog? and the o2 concentrator ? is there a 3rd thing...


appreciate ya


just An Observer looking in...
Dude question everything because more heads are better than one. Everyone is a genius in their way. You always ask the right questions and thats 100% of finding the solutions
 
  • Deleted by Observer
Show…
Dude question everything because more heads are better than one. Everyone is a genius in their way. You always ask the right questions and thats 100% of finding the solutions
I am curious about the effects/ A-ffect of CO2 water though
Gases are independent co2 doesn’t effect o2. The electrolysis is bunk bro don’t drink the koolaid on that. It produces microbubbles that trick the DO sensor into supersaturated levels but its not. Plus it can add heavy metals to your water and is NOT recommended for water containing minerals.

@Moe.Red had already achieved 300 mg/L.

Trust me when i say i have explored about every option available nothing will beat an o2 concentrator in safety and results… it just won’t happen bro
Oh and that top bit was some shit chaptgpt3 spit out

It's not always accurate.

Pretty sure it was Lobotomized lol
It got too good at some things, speculatively
 
I am curious about the effects/ A-ffect of CO2 water though
Oh and that top bit was some shit chaptgpt3 spit out

It's not always accurate.

Pretty sure it was Lobotomized lol
It got too good at some things, speculatively
So I don't ever know what to trust from it exactly without further questioning


due diligence
 
I am curious about the effects/ A-ffect of CO2 water though
Oh and that top bit was some shit chaptgpt3 spit out

It's not always accurate.

Pretty sure it was Lobotomized lol
It got too good at some things, speculatively
Co2 dissolved in water forms carbonic acid. I used to use co2 with a rex griggs reactor to inject co2 into my water planted tanks for growth and to control the PH.

At 4DKH a 1.0 PH drop would give you roughly 30ppm of co2 in the water. At atmospheric levels its about 4ppm when at equilibrium
 
just thought this was cool, curious what the oxygen content of that "liquid air" would be

obviously o2 concentrator would be higher

i just thought this was cool to share.

 
just thought this was cool, curious what the oxygen content of that "liquid air" would be

obviously o2 concentrator would be higher

i just thought this was cool to share.

Cool to see. No clue how much if any o2 it would add but definitely would likely need a constant supply in high volume. Compressed o2 would even be a far far far more viable option
 
So Hydro has shown how elevated O2 levels in your feed water will help increase yields. In soil, since it uses a different mode of ion transfer, it is harder to hold onto the DO in the source water because of the equilibrium effect it would experience once in the soil due to the slower transmission of ions. This would lead me to believe that direct O2 injection in the soil medium would be the only real way to present O2 in the rhizosphere and be able to consistently keep it at a level that is above atmospheric O2.

Is this correct?
 
So Hydro has shown how elevated O2 levels in your feed water will help increase yields. In soil, since it uses a different mode of ion transfer, it is harder to hold onto the DO in the source water because of the equilibrium effect it would experience once in the soil due to the slower transmission of ions. This would lead me to believe that direct O2 injection in the soil medium would be the only real way to present O2 in the rhizosphere and be able to consistently keep it at a level that is above atmospheric O2.

Is this correct?
In an media ideally you need to separate the rhizosphere and atmosphere. Soil is a natural barrier in a sense. The gas exchange is slower so really all you need to do is provide a steady source and a way to deliver it into the soil. I have some theories on how to do this but yes its likely that direct delivery to the soil would be the most efficient.
 
Back
Top Bottom