Pipecarver
POTM Winner
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2023
- Messages
- 2,464
- Reaction score
- 12,399
No data to offer but I was wanting side lighting for a while and I've been discouraged from it from my limited research.....I can't remember details YT video's Dr.B.B I think and a few others I watched over the years. I think its for the same reason we lollypop that just waste nutes on lower waste product or inferior buds......Not to say that we can't boost lower fruit but it may be at the expense of the top. I think there was some increase in volume but not worth the added elect cost....Peer reviewed paper on sub canopy lighting @Moe.Red
Short answer? The study saw a 15% - 20% increase in yield volume overall along with an increase in terpene and cannabinoid profiles if you use red-blue or red-blue-green light spectrums.
The study also placed the lights 2 cm above soil line. As far as I understand it, the leaf tops photosynthesize while the leaf bottoms are where transpiration occurs. If this is the case then it would hold that placing lights below the leaf tops is counterintuitive to what we're trying to achieve. Placing the horizontally placed light bars 6" - 9" below the canopy line angled downward so that they are hitting the leaf tops in the undercanopy would seem like the logical place to place them for most effective photon delivery to that part of the plant. Obviously as the plants grow taller you're going to want to be able to move the SCL to best expose the plants to as much light to as many leaves as possible. SCL placement would depend on if you are growing into a screen or letting the plants grow normally. The screen grower would want to place them horizontally for the best coverage of that area whereas the normal grower would want the light installed vertically so that the entire length of the plant gets the added light energy. I would also add that it would seem that the added SCL contributes to the overall PPFD in the tent vs just the overhead light. The one thing I'm not sure of is the heat being generated from the SCL. How close can you place your plants to a 60w LED light?
It would seem that with a 15% increase in yield on a normal 2 lb tent run you're going to increase your yield an extra 5oz or more.
The SCL's I posted above total 240w between the 4 of them at a cost of $100. Estimated additional running cost for electricity would be around $10 a month. Initial light purchase of $100 + $40(4 month from veg to harvest) would mean a $140 initial outlay. Zips of weed out in Cali are going for $90. If the increase in yield is correct SCL should be a no brainer.
I've read and talked to many people about sidelighting and most don't think it does enough to warrant it but this study seems to say different.
Can anyone refute this with quantifiable data so that I don't waste $140 on broscience?
I remember being keen to add more lighting and boost that lower 1/3 of the plant most chop off........but I gave up on it...